Monday, October 13, 2014

Midterm

Introduction:

In “Portfolio Keeping: A Guide for Students”, a portfolio is defined as a meaningful collection of selected artifacts or documents, collected over time and across interests. In particular, my goal is to create a process portfolio that can be transformed into a presentation portfolio by the end of the semester. My portfolio is a process indeed. Aside from being self-declared technologically impaired, the portfolio making process has been less than a breeze. There have been challenges and setbacks, both in the process portfolio keeping as well as in the writing assignments to go along with. However, overall I feel that, although I am struggling, I will triumph and reach my goal by the end of the semester.

Beginning with the challenges, I came in thinking I was a rather competent writer and this class would be a breeze. I soon found that to be completely inaccurate of an assumption.  I found myself struggling almost immediately and this is due to the type of writer I was accustomed to being. I have always been a science-based learner, and therefore the majority of my writing was just that: Black and white, Right or wrong, Fact or fiction. It was always clear the structure in which to write and exactly how to go about that. Just about every scientific paper is the same, introduction followed by a ton of factual findings and evidence to back up said factual evidence and a conclusion pulling it all together.

Rhetorical writing is so much harder. Never have I had to develop a personal letter that portrayed a certain storyline or reached certain goals; you can’t write a personal letter following the same structure as an academic essay. However, in allowing myself to be vulnerable and inexperienced I learned the right and wrong ways to write rhetorically, as well as the strategies and choices to make that would positively affect my academic performance. In doing so I became a better writer, rhetorically, and opened my horizons to the different types of writing persona’s I can adapt to.

Here you can see my uncertainty about entering the class as well as where I began the semester and with the mindset I explained above: Dear Instructor Letter

Here you can see my struggles within the class that I was experiencing as a result of allowing myself to forget what I knew about writing academically so as to learn to write rhetorically: Challenges Portfolio Post

One aspect of the class that really helped me in successfully grasping rhetorical writing was analytical reading. Reading with a critical lens on allowed me to better understand the subject I was reading and focus on what was important in writing responses to said readings. One example of rhetorically reading was in class examinations of pieces by Herbert, Thomas and King. (Scan in class notes here along with King’s critical notes).  












One of the biggest obstacles I faced in rhetorical writing was learning how to cite works properly so as to not plagiarize. The in-class handout that described to us what was considered plagiarism and what was not, as well as how to properly avoid it was extremely helpful. Here are my in class notes on how to properly cite different sources as well as the link to OWL at Perdue website where there are further instructions on how to cite:OWL Perdue MLA Citing. 
 These two sources combined with the plagiarism handout we went over in class allowed me to understand fully what plagiarism was and how to avoid it through proper citing and paraphrasing.

All of these aspects helped me grow and learn as a rhetorical reader and writer in this class, however I was still experiencing some difficulties. Perhaps the best way in which I learned just how to write appropriately for rhetorical purposes was through editing and revision. We had multiple in class peer review sessions for out major writing assignments. While this was helpful, I felt I needed something more critical to push me to question the decisions and choices I was making in my writing, When I went to the writing center for revision of my analytical review I got just that.

It was strange at first, I assumed she was going to read through my paper and tell me what to fix and I would be on my way. However, that was not the case. Instead, she would read and look at me and ask, “What is the purpose of this paragraph/section/sentence/word?” and after I responded to her she would then reply with, “Do you think this accomplishes what your purpose for it is?”. In doing so she was forcing me to make the decisions about the importance of words and phrases. She was forcing me to grade my choices and make new ones according to whether or not my first, second, or even third attempts were practical: 






These two revisions sessions helped me rethink my processes to writing and decision making strategies for rhetorical writing in the future. I personally revised this writing assignment here, putting into effect the strategies and decision making skills I have acquired throughout the course. (Insert revised piece).


As much as I have learned thus far in the art of rhetorical writing, I still have a long ways to go. I would like to practice my rhetorical writing skills so as to be able to write and accomplish the task at hand without any setbacks or major revisions necessary. I would like to become so good at rhetorical writing and strategies that I will one day be able to advise someone as lost as myself in the art of rhetoric.

Rubric:

1.     Well Developed
2.     Well Developed
3.     Well Developed
4.     Well Developed
5.     Developed/Needs Improvement

6.     Developed/Well Developed

No comments:

Post a Comment